…the Western Sydney Wanderers, that is. The
players have been embroiled
in a pay dispute with the club, which has offered them only ten percent of the
revenues from participation in FIFA’s pointless annual parade of continental
champions’ league winners, the Club World Cup. The players have been asking for
fifty percent – the same ratio that Adelaide United got when they partook of
the same event in 2008.
There are a few examples of professional
sporting teams being run along the lines of workers’ co-operatives. In 1890,
baseball players disenchanted by team owners’ use of the reserve clause to hold
down their earnings formed the Players’ League, once
of three major leagues in operation that season, with franchises in Boston, New
York, (the then-still independent city of) Brooklyn, Buffalo, Philadelphia,
Pittsburgh, Cleveland, and Chicago. Players took the profits for themselves,
and clubs didn’t collude to reduce players’ bargaining power.
Prior to 1905, Australian cricket tours to
Britain were run by the players themselves for their own financial benefit,
with the Melbourne Cricket Club getting a slice of the profits in exchange for
lending its support and branding (pre-Federation Australian tourists wore the
blue, red, and white of the club rather than the green and gold introduced by
the Board of Control). The formation of the Australian Board of Control for
International Cricket (now Cricket Australia) ensured that the profits from
outbound Ashes tours would be siphoned away from the players and towards the
administrators. The final blow to player sovereignty was inflicted
in 1912, when six of the country’s top cricketers were left out of a touring
squad bound for Britain when they demanded the right to choose their own
manager for the tour.
1890 and 1905 were victories for capitalist
owners and administrators over the players – the sporting equivalents of the
Freikorps’ shooting of Rosa Luxemburg and Franco’s coup against the Spanish
Second Republic. They helped to ensure that professional sportspeople would
spend the rest of the century battling the reserve clause, the maximum wage,
and other restraints on their bargaining power.
What is needed is for professional leagues
to be run on the lines of the Players’ League, with players owning and managing
their own franchises, and controlling one hundred percent of the profits
generated by their labours.
Alternatively, players’ bargaining power
can be increased by upping the number of owner-controlled franchises bidding
for their services. American baseball players benefited from the existence of ‘third’
major leagues in the 1910s (the Federal League) and the 1940s (the Mexican
League), in both cases either jumping ship to the new league or using its
existence to get a better deal from the established leagues. A rebel league is
a difficult proposition in soccer, with FIFA’s totalising control over the
sport, but the original North American Soccer League showed that it can be done.